Set America Free Notes&Comments

One New Yorker’s 9/11 tribute.

Set America Free Coalition members Gal Luft and Milton Copulos write in the Washington Times:

“On September 11, across the nation Americans will gather in remembrance of the nearly 3,000 victims of the worst terror attack in U.S. history. Yet, even as we gather in mournful homage, representatives of the nations largely responsible for the tragedy will meet in Vienna, Austria, at the 141st gathering of the Organization of Petroleum Countries (OPEC) with a different purpose: keeping oil prices high to ensure the continued flow of petrodollars into their coffers. “  Keep reading

A recent Detroit Free Press article: “With voters clamoring for relief from sky-high gas prices and facing long waits to buy hybrid cars, bipartisan legislation to increase production of fuel-efficient vehicles and alternative fuels is gaining momentum. More than a quarter of the Senate, including five potential presidential candidates, and 84 House members [ed: 88 as of now] are pushing for a vote on “vehicle and fuel choice” measures that are supported by an unusual alliance of conservative and liberal groups [...] The fuel choices bills reflect proposals of the Set America Free Coalition, a group composed of conservative-leaning military hawks from the Reagan and first Bush administrations, social conservatives, environmentalists and the labor movement.”

in his recent NY Post editorial:

“Our dependence on oil is sapping America’s inde pendence. We must diversify the fuels that power our nation, or risk ceding our nation’s power to rulers separated from us by a world in geography and by centuries in values.

“Oil recently hit a record high above $75 a barrel and is expected to keep climbing. Fifty-dollar fill-ups have become routine. But couple the already tight global oil market with the fact that much of the world’s oil comes from countries that are unstable or hostile to America, and you realize that our economy and national security hang upon tenuous strings.

“Our dependence on oil means that royals in Saudi Arabia, rebels in Nigeria, mullahs in Iran or Venezuela’s anti-American President Hugo Chavez all have an outsized power over our nation’s destiny and international relations. We are just one well-orchestrated terrorist attack or political upheaval away from an overnight price spike to $100 a barrel that would send the global economy tumbling and the industrialized world scrambling to secure supplies.

“[...] The growing global dependency on oil endangers our nation. Failure to act will leave us a pitiful giant, like Gulliver in Lilliput, tied down and subject to the whim of smaller nations who have oil.

“And the outrage is that we will have given them the ropes and helped them tie the knots – for solutions are readily at hand.

“It is time to set America free. Cutting our dependence on oil will strengthen our security, preserve our independence, and energize our economy. “

An excerpt from his speech yesterday at Columbia University:

“Another serious long-term structural challenge is energy security. Today this is top of mind for many Americans because they are paying about three dollars per gallon at the gas pump – a cost that generates real hardship for all those who are trying to make ends meet. These prices are largely attributable to a strong global economy that brings with it an increasing demand for oil, particularly in rapidly growing and developing emerging markets such as China and India.

“The fact that our economy has remained strong in the face of these high oil prices is a testament to its remarkable resilience. The global demand for oil is outstripping supply and we as a nation have a long-term structural problem: We consume much more oil than we produce; We are too dependent on foreign sources of oil; And too much of it comes from troubled parts of the world. And this will still be true if gas prices decline.

“The President and this Administration are focused on this problem, and have made important proposals and progress in a number of areas. But everyone I have talked with, from the President, to Sam Bodman, our Secretary of Energy, to Senators and Congressman on both sides of the aisle, agree that much more has to be done. It is a major long-term challenge and one we need to fix through a comprehensive approach. We need to do more on the supply side, and we need to do more to conserve energy. In addition, we need to do much more in terms of investing in new technologies and further developing alternative sources of energy, including nuclear power* and ethanol. In doing so, we need to encourage market-based solutions. Moreover, an energy policy that takes us toward greater energy security should also lead to cleaner air and cleaner water. ”

*We should point out:  unlike in the 1970s, today only 3% of U.S. electricity is generated from oil, so shifting more electricity generation to nuclear power (and solar, and wind, etc etc) may be useful for a variety of reasons, but has nothing to do with reducing oil dependence.

“Unless somebody discovers something very quickly and very accessibly, we’re all going to be dumbfounded at how high the price of oil will go, including me,” Jim Rogers, the co-founder of George Soros’s Quantum hedge fund, said during an interview in Singapore.

to Reps Grace Napolitano [CA-38], Mark Udall [CO-2],  Curt Weldon [PA-7], and Cynthia McKinney [GA-4] for becoming cosponsors of HR4409, The Fuel Choices for American Security Act.
Is your Representative on board yet?